The 777-200LR became the world's longest-range commercial airliner when it entered service in 2006. It has a maximum range of 9,395 nm and was intended for ultra-long-haul routes such as New York to Singapore, or Chicago to Sydney - up to about 19 hours flying time. The -200LR features an increased MTOW and the same wing as the 777-300ER.
Overview Emirates operates the 777-200 aircraft in three different configurations. Aviation Fanatic - Aircrafts, airports, airlines, aviators, air museums, airshows, pilot logbook. You deserve to feel at home, even when you're on the move. Our Boeing 777-200LR aircraft offers a variety of signature products and experiences unlike anything else in the sky.
BOEING 777-200LR and 777-F
From SKYbrary Wiki
B77L
Aircraft | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | 777-200LR and 777-F | |||
Manufacturer | BOEING | |||
Body | Wide | |||
Wing | Fixed Wing | |||
Position | Low wing | |||
Tail | Regular tail (Dihedral) | |||
WTC | Heavy | |||
APC | C | |||
Type code | L2J | |||
RFF Category | 9 | |||
Engine | Jet | |||
Engine count | Multi | |||
Position | Underwing mounted | |||
Landing gear | Tricycle retractable | |||
Mass group | 5 | |||
|
BOEING 777-200LR and 777-F
Description
The 777-200LR became the world's longest-range commercial airliner when it entered service in 2006. It has a maximum range of 9,395 nm17,399,540 m <br />17,399.54 km <br />57,085,105.029 ft <br /> and was intended for ultra-long-haul routes such as New York to Singapore, or Chicago to Sydney - up to about 19 hours flying time.The -200LR features an increased MTOW and the same wing as the 777-300ER. The 777F is a cargo version of this variant. Three optional auxiliary fuel tanks take the baseline fuel tank capacity from 181,289 l to 203,570 l. Other new features include raked wingtips, redesigned main landing gear, and additional structural strengthening. As with the -300ER, the -200LR is equipped with wingtip extensions of 3.90 m. B77L is member of the B777 family of aircraft.
B77l Vs B77w
Technical Data
B77l Aircraft Interior
Wing span | 60.9 m199.803 ft <br /> |
---|---|
Length | 63.7 m208.99 ft <br /> |
Height | 18.6 m61.024 ft <br /> |
Powerplant | 2 x GE 90-110B1 (489 kN) or 2 x GE 90-115BL (512 kN). |
Engine model | General Electric GE90 |
Performance Data
Take-Off | Initial Climb (to 5000 ft) | Initial Climb (to FL150) | Initial Climb (to FL240) | MACH Climb | Cruise | Initial Descent (to FL240) | Descent (to FL100) | Descent (FL100 & below) | Approach | ||||||||||
V2 (IAS) | 123 kts | IAS | 175 kts | IAS | 280 kts | IAS | 280 kts | MACH | 0.83 | TAS | 490 kts | MACH | 0.84 | IAS | 240 kts | IAS | 210 kts | Vapp (IAS) | 140 kts |
Distance | 2970 m | ROC | 2500 ft/min | ROC | 2000 ft/min | ROC | 1500 ft/min | ROC | 2000 ft/min | MACH | 0.84 | ROD | 1000 ft/min | ROD | 3000 ft/min | MCS | 240 kts | Distance | 1700 m |
MTOW | 347450347,450 kg <br />347.45 tonnes <br /> kg | Ceiling | FL431 | ROD | 2000 ft/min | APC | C | ||||||||||||
WTC | H | Range | 93809,380 nm <br />17,371,760 m <br />17,371.76 km <br />56,993,963.296 ft <br /> NM |
Accidents & Serious Incidents involving B77L
- B77L, Copenhagen Denmark, 2011 (On 17 April 2011, a Boeing 777F bounced three times during an attempted landing at Copenhagen during which the underside of the aircraft was damaged by two tailstrikes. The second occurred during over-rotation for a go around commenced after thrust reverser deployment, with 760 metres of the 3300 metre-long runway remaining. The Investigation observed that a go around initiated after thrust reverser deployment was contrary to an express prohibition in the aircraft type FCOM. It was noted that the aircraft commander was an instructor pilot and that both pilots had less than 200 hours experience on the aircraft type.)
- B77L, Paris CDG France, 2015 (On 22 May 2015, a Boeing 777F augmented crew attempted a reduced thrust daylight takeoff from Paris CDG using a thrust setting based on a weight 100 tonnes below the actual weight after an undetected crew error. The tailstrike protection system prevented fuselage runway contact after rotation attempts but only after a call from an augmenting crew member was full thrust set with the aircraft becoming airborne near the runway end. The Investigation noted poor crew performance but concluded that operator management of the risk involved and the corresponding regulatory oversight had been inadequate in a number of ways.)